Skip to main content

Advertising & Marketing Disputes

Lewis Silkin’s disputes team have years of unsurpassed experience in all types of advertising & marketing disputes, acting for advertisers, agencies, production companies and media owners.

Our experience includes:

  • making and defending ASA and other regulatory challenges through judicial review when necessary
  • bringing and defending competitor complaints particularly in relation to comparative advertising
  • dealing with consumer claims and trading standards’ investigations
  • disputes over plagiarism and other IP infringements and defamation
  • fallings out between advertisers and agencies over service or transparency issues
  • contractual claims involving the production and dissemination of advertising and marketing materials

We also have expertise in relation to digital, online and social media advertising which often involves cutting-edge data protection, privacy and regulatory issues.  In addition, we are often involved in employment, corporate and real estate related disputes in the advertising & marketing sectors, such as employee and discrimination claims, shareholder and SPA warranty matters and issues over property leases or planning permissions for advertising sites. 

Related items

Liquidator loses protection of a freezing order following serious failings at earlier ex parte hearing

14 May 2018

In Banca Turco Romana S.A. (in liquidation) v Cortuk and Others, the Commercial Court in London has underlined the need for applicants to give full and frank disclosure when seeking relief at ex parte (without notice) hearings.

Mediation

02 May 2018

Mediation is a common method of alternative dispute resolution (‘ADR’). It is a consensual process, with any settlement having to be agreed by both parties. If successful, mediation can save the time and costs of fighting a dispute through the courts or in arbitration.

Jurisdiction Challenges

09 April 2018

Where a claim is litigated can be very important. This inbrief provides you with a guide on how to challenge the jurisdiction of the English courts if a claim is started here. We also highlight the steps that can be taken in England if a claim is commenced elsewhere, even though you believe it should be litigated or arbitrated in England.

Service of a Claim Form by email – get it wrong at your peril

27 March 2018

Communicating by e-mail is common practice. However unless you adhere to the procedural steps required by the Civil Procedure Rules service of a claim form by email will be defective. The Supreme Court’s decision considered whether to grant relief from sanctions to an unrepresented party for failing to adhere to the procedural steps.

This is my advice. By the way, it might be wrong!

05 March 2018

When do solicitors have to warn their client that the advice they are giving may turn out to be incorrect? The Court of Appeal has recently considered this issue.

Early Specific Disclosure Applications – factors the court will consider

22 January 2018

A decision in the Technology and Construction Court (“TCC") sheds light on the applicable test for early specific disclosure and the relevant considerations in making a successful application. Applications for early specific disclosure are relatively rare so the judgment provides helpful guidance.

English courts and overseas defendants: jurisdiction challenges and the “two-fold test”

15 January 2018

When a dispute involves a foreign party or events that took place in another jurisdiction, questions often arise as to where the dispute should be determined.

Compulsory mediation?

11 January 2018

In October 2017 the Civil Justice Council (CJC) published its interim report on the future role of alternative approaches to dispute resolution (ADR). The report makes various recommendations as well as inviting responses. It follows input from a working group tasked in January 2017 to examine uptake of ADR in civil justice. The primary purpose of the report is to find ways to encourage its use.

Back To Top