• Work experience row reaches the courtroom

    2nd July 2012, By Rachel Rooksby in Employment

    Cait Reilly, the graduate contesting the Government’s unpaid work schemes, commenced her judicial review application in the High Court this week. It has thrown the spotlight back on a contentious issue, discussed in an article we wrote for Employment Law Journal in April. Read more

    1 comment Schemes that get people into work are better like Georgia Works and the Wiltshire Jobs Scheme....

  • Transferring assets inter-group, at book or market value?

    2nd July 2012, By Stephen O'Mahony in Corporate

    If you are transferring assets, up or across, between group companies at less than their market value, check that the transferring company has distributable profits; otherwise you may be causing an unlawful distribution. Read more

  • Hammer horror makes unfair prejudice

    2nd July 2012, in Corporate

    The court has ordered the compulsory sale of a shareholder’s shares, where his attack on his fellow shareholder (who was also his brother) with a hammer was considered to be unfairly prejudicial conduct on his part, as it made it impossible for the two of them to continue their relationship as directors and shareholders of their company. Read more

  • Court of Appeal decides the meaning of “best” and “all reasonable endeavours” for Jet2

    2nd July 2012, By Nigel Enticknap in Corporate, Dispute Resolution

    The Court of Appeal has confirmed the ruling of the High Court in the case of Jet2.com Limited v Blackpool Airport Limited that a party’s obligation in a contract to exercise “best endeavours” or “all reasonable endeavours” could require that party to act against its own commercial interests. Read more

  • How the Barclay brothers took control of hotel company

    2nd July 2012, By Nicola Mallett in Corporate

    Although there were pre-emption provisions on transfers of shares in a company owning three major London hotels, the Barclay brothers were able to get round those restrictions by buying all the shares in one of the shareholders of the company. The Court of Appeal has confirmed that those pre-emption provisions did not extend to a transfer of the shares in one of the company’s corporate shareholders. Read more

About the Journal

Here you can read our opinions on the recent changes in law and business that affect you. From age discrimination to ASA decisions, and tax to twitter, this is what we think.

This is your chance to let us know what you think about these issues too. You can comment on any post, and we look forward to hearing your views.

Find us on: linkedin youtube slideshare
 Advanced Filter

Archive

July 2012
MTWTFSS
1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031