EU trade mark reforms come closer (Brands & IP newsnotes - issue 1)
27 September 2015
Seven years after the European Commission started its evaluation of the European trade marks framework, the texts of the new proposed legislation were finally published in June 2015.
Some key reforms
- Basic definitions: Farewell to the “CTM” and “OHIM”; say hello to the “European Union Trade Mark” (EUTM) and “European Intellectual Property Office” (EUIPO).
- Class headings: The codification of the IP Translator decision from 2012. A Nice class heading cannot be interpreted as covering all possible goods and services in that class, unless those goods/services are clearly covered by the literal meaning of the heading.
- Goods in transit: strengthening the anti-counterfeiting tool box, the new legislation gives brand owners the right to take action against counterfeit goods which are merely in transit through the EU. But importers will still have a defence where they can prove that the trade mark holder would not be entitled to prevent sale in the country of the goods’ final destination.
The new legislation is expected to be adopted in 2016, following which most of the new Regulation will be in force within 90 days. Member States will have three years to implement the new Trade Marks Directive.
Things to think about
Holders of CTMs filed before June 2012 will have a six month grace period from the new EUTM Regulation coming into force to make a declaration as to whether any class headings were intended to cover all goods/services in that class. Otherwise the specification will be deemed to include only those goods and services covered by its clear meaning. Rights holders should start to review their trade mark portfolios now to identify where declarations are needed. They should also review their anti-counterfeiting strategies to identify opportunities to exploit their strengthened rights against goods in transit.This article was first published in the Brands & IP newsnotes publication - issue 1.
It never rains, but it pours…(Brands & IP Newsnotes - issue 1)27 September 2015
Registered designs are used to protect the appearance of products. In considering whether to allow registration, several factors come into play: what else is already out there (the ‘prior art’); who will use it (the ‘informed user’); and what ‘degree of freedom’ does the designer have in arriving at the particular design?
You’re cabbing a laugh (Brands & IP Newsnotes - issue 1)27 September 2015
The High Court has refused an application by the manufacturer of the iconic London black cab (“LTC”) for permission to adduce survey evidence in a claim for passing off.
What’s New Copycat? (Brands & IP newsnotes - issue 1)27 September 2015
Last year, consumer group Which? carried out a comprehensive survey of the copycat product packaging market in the UK. It found that over 150 of retailers’ own-label products “mimicked” the market-leading brand-owner’s packaging.
A copyright work in 140 characters? (Brands & IP Newsnotes - issue 1)27 September 2015
It isn’t easy to keep your social media followers entertained with rafts of enthralling and hilarious new material.
Not so-far, Sofa Workshop (Brands & IP newsnotes - issue 3)27 September 2015
If a trade mark proprietor does not make ‘genuine use’ of its marks, they may be vulnerable to attack from third parties.
When “logos” turn into “no-goes” (Brands & IP Newsnotes - issue 1)27 September 2015
As we move even deeper into an age of digital advertising and social media, it is becoming increasingly important for businesses to have a short hand for their brand; something which denotes the business, stands out as a guarantee of origin and makes the brand instantly recognisable. We’re talking about logos.
Access to justice: IPEC 1 - MoJ 0 (Brands & IP Newsnotes - issue 1)27 September 2015
Conducting litigation in a cost effective and proportionate manner can be a challenge, especially if it involves big brand owners going toe to toe. But help is at hand in the form of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (‘IPEC’).